# Watch a governed run, end to end.

**Watch a governed run, end to end.**

A complete replay of a real LawCrew Document Review run: the graph as it executed, the evidence behind one contested clause, the approval task a partner saw, and the audit export that came out of it. Nothing is gated and nothing is asked of you.

Replay takes about four minutes. Client content has been replaced; the structure, timings and costs are real.

Interactive demo · no signup

[Start the replay](/demo) [Run it yourself instead](/signup)

**Run 8f21-4c · LawCrew Document Review**

**Jurisdiction router**

Governing law identified as Singapore from the choice-of-law clause. Routed to the SG Legal Practice Pack template variant.

**Evidence Research Pod**

Four agents in parallel over statutes, judgments, firm precedent and commentary. 41 chunks retrieved, 12 admitted above the authority threshold.

**Drafting**

Nine clauses generated, each with its evidence set and sufficiency score attached to the artefact.

**Adversarial reviewer**

Argued against each clause from the counterparty position. Two clauses returned for revision; one revision loop, bounded at three.

**Regulatory Review Pod**

Deterministic checks, not model judgement. 14 passed, 1 marginal — the marginal check raised the sampling weight for this matter.

**Abstention on clause 7**

Sufficiency 0.64 against a floor of 0.72. Structured insufficiency result issued naming the missing commencement notice. Routed to the knowledge-gap queue.

**Professional approval**

Waited 2h 33m. Approved with two edits by a named qualified professional; both edits recorded as Correction Records with reasons.

**Release of the artefact**

Draft released to the matter store. No external side effect declared, so no idempotency key required.

## What most demos skip.

This replay deliberately includes the awkward parts, because they are the parts that decide whether the product is real.

**An actual abstention**

Clause 7 could not be established. You will see the insufficiency result, the named missing source and the queue it went to — not a confident paragraph with a hedge in it.

**A human overruling the crew**

The approving partner changed two clauses. You will see the diff, the reason, and how those corrections became evaluation cases for the next release.

**The bill**

Platform and model credits itemised by node, the SGD equivalent, and what the same run costs under BYOK. [How credits work →](/credits)

**Run this yourself in 20 minutes**

The trial ships with the same sample matter. Sign up, pick the template, run the case, read the evidence, approve the task and open the audit trail. It costs about 40 of your 5,000 credits.

[Start free](/signup) [Quickstart](/quickstart)

**See it with your own documents**

45 minutes with a solutions engineer, using your jurisdiction, your document types and your review policy. Bring your compliance lead; the second half of the session is the audit export.

[Book a demo](/book-demo)

---

Canonical page: https://dev.krewos.ai/demo