Interactive demo · no signup
Watch a governed run, end to end.
A complete replay of a real LawCrew Document Review run: the graph as it executed, the evidence behind one contested clause, the approval task a partner saw, and the audit export that came out of it. Nothing is gated and nothing is asked of you.
Replay takes about four minutes. Client content has been replaced; the structure, timings and costs are real.
- 1 · Graph
- 2 · Evidence
- 3 · Approval
- 4 · Audit export
- 5 · Cost
Run 8f21-4c · LawCrew Document Review
Completed- Jurisdiction router
Governing law identified as Singapore from the choice-of-law clause. Routed to the SG Legal Practice Pack template variant.
1.2s - Evidence Research Pod
Four agents in parallel over statutes, judgments, firm precedent and commentary. 41 chunks retrieved, 12 admitted above the authority threshold.
38s - Drafting
Nine clauses generated, each with its evidence set and sufficiency score attached to the artefact.
1m 04s - Adversarial reviewer
Argued against each clause from the counterparty position. Two clauses returned for revision; one revision loop, bounded at three.
2 returned - Regulatory Review Pod
Deterministic checks, not model judgement. 14 passed, 1 marginal — the marginal check raised the sampling weight for this matter.
1 marginal - Abstention on clause 7
Sufficiency 0.64 against a floor of 0.72. Structured insufficiency result issued naming the missing commencement notice. Routed to the knowledge-gap queue.
Abstained - Professional approval
Waited 2h 33m. Approved with two edits by a named qualified professional; both edits recorded as Correction Records with reasons.
Human - Release of the artefact
Draft released to the matter store. No external side effect declared, so no idempotency key required.
Done
What most demos skip.
This replay deliberately includes the awkward parts, because they are the parts that decide whether the product is real.
An actual abstention
Clause 7 could not be established. You will see the insufficiency result, the named missing source and the queue it went to — not a confident paragraph with a hedge in it.
A human overruling the crew
The approving partner changed two clauses. You will see the diff, the reason, and how those corrections became evaluation cases for the next release.
The bill
Platform and model credits itemised by node, the SGD equivalent, and what the same run costs under BYOK. How credits work →
Run this yourself in 20 minutes
The trial ships with the same sample matter. Sign up, pick the template, run the case, read the evidence, approve the task and open the audit trail. It costs about 40 of your 5,000 credits.
Start freeQuickstartSee it with your own documents
45 minutes with a solutions engineer, using your jurisdiction, your document types and your review policy. Bring your compliance lead; the second half of the session is the audit export.
Book a demo