Pricing · Estimator
Build the business case before you talk to us.
Enter your crew, your volume, your review posture and your own manual baseline. The estimator returns credits per month, the tier that covers them, cost per outcome unit against your baseline, and payback in months.
We do not supply a default manual baseline. A vendor-supplied one makes the return look manufactured, and buyers are right not to believe it.
Your inputs
The work
Requires the Singapore Legal Practice Pack — S$18,000 / year, included below.
Set by the Crew Template. Every cost figure below is per outcome unit.
Governance posture
Legal outputs stay at 100% permanently. Sampling is available on Professional and above for crews that qualify.
Your manual baseline
Leave blank if you intend to implement in-house.
- Credits / month
- 167,200
- 31,200 platform · 136,000 model
- Credit value
- S$1,672
- Inside the Professional allowance
- Cost per matter
- S$9.75
- Platform + Pack, 400 matters
- Payback
- 1.4 mo
- On S$25,000 implementation
Recommended tier
- Subscription
S$2,400 / mo - Included credits
250,000 / mo - Credits you would draw
167,200 / mo - Headroom
82,800 · ~198 more matters - Top-up required
None
- Singapore Legal Practice Pack
S$1,500 / mo - Builder seats needed
4 of 15 - Reviewer seats needed
29 of 100 - Audit retention
Configurable - Total platform cost
S$3,900 / mo
67% of the monthly credit allowance consumed at this volume. Practice would not cover it, and would not give you configurable audit retention or SSO — which is why the recommendation is Professional rather than the cheaper tier the credit figure alone would suggest.
Cost per outcome vs your baseline
| Line | Manual baseline | With KrewOS | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reviewer minutes per matter | 62 | 17 | −45 |
| Reviewer cost per matter | S$74.40 | S$20.40 | −S$54.00 |
| Platform cost per matter | S$0.00 | S$9.75 | +S$9.75 |
| Fully loaded cost per matter | S$74.40 | S$30.15 | −S$44.25 |
| Monthly cost at 400 matters | S$29,760 | S$12,060 | −S$17,700 |
| Reviewer hours displaced per month | — | 300 | 300 |
| Payback on S$25,000 implementation | — | 1.4 months | — |
Displaced hours are reviewer minutes returned to fee-earning work, not headcount removed. The 17 minutes that remain are the professional sign-off on an evidenced draft — which stays, permanently, because that is the output your firm signs.
If you bring your own model keys
| Line | Managed keys | BYOK |
|---|---|---|
| Credits drawn per month | 167,200 | 31,200 |
| Platform cost per month | S$3,900 | S$3,900 |
| Model inference | In credits | Billed by your provider |
| Matters before a top-up is needed | ~598 | ~3,205 |
Growth scenarios
| Matters / month | Credits | Top-up | Total platform | Cost / matter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | 83,600 | — | S$3,900 | S$19.50 |
| 400 — your input | 167,200 | — | S$3,900 | S$9.75 |
| 600 | 250,800 | S$8 | S$3,908 | S$6.51 |
| 1,000 | 418,000 | S$1,512 | S$5,412 | S$5.41 |
| 1,000 with BYOK | 78,000 | — | S$3,900 | S$3.90 |
What is published, and what is modelled
The tier prices, credit allowances, seat limits, Pack licences and top-up bundle rates above are the published rate card — you can check every one of them on Pricing. The per-matter consumption is the worked run ledger on Credits: 78 platform and 340 model credits for a 24-page legal review under full human review.
Four figures are modelled, because the rate card publishes one worked matter and this page offers six templates, four length bands and three review postures. They are the numbers to argue with:
- Document length
Consumption and sign-off scale by 0.5, 1, 2 and 3.5 across the four bands, anchored on the published 24-page matter. - Crew Template
Each template carries a consumption factor relative to the published legal review. - Residual sign-off
17 minutes a reviewed matter at this length and template. - Seats
One builder seat per 100 matters a month; one named reviewer seat per four hours of monthly sign-off.
Email this business case
Send the full working — inputs, assumptions, per-node credit breakdown and the three-year view — as a PDF to yourself and your finance lead. We keep a copy so a solutions engineer can open the conversation with your numbers rather than ours.
Check it against a real run
Every figure here derives from the published per-node credit table. Run the same template on three of your own documents during the trial and compare the ledger to this estimate before anyone signs anything.
Start freePressure-test the assumptions
Bring the estimate to a 45-minute session. The two numbers worth arguing about are your manual baseline and the residual review minutes — everything else is arithmetic on a published rate.
Book a demo